Posts Tagged ‘ Bible ’

Biblical Witness & Christian Life in Relational Perspective

The third part of what is a four part review of Relational Theology: A Contemporary Introduction. Part one is here and part two here.

The section, Biblical Witness in Relational Perspective, is quite short containing four essays, all of which are excellent and well written.

I am going to tell you a little bit about and quote from Dennis Bratcher’s The Revelation and Inspiration of Scripture.  Dr. Bratcher starts the essay off telling us, “Christianity is a response to God’s self-disclosure.” A God the reveals Godself, self-discloses, is a relational God and this is reinforced in the biblical texts.

Scripture is the witness that the community of faith has borne to or about revelation…. God is the content of the revelation. Scripture tells us about and points us toward that revelation.

God revealed Himself in history (events), and the community of faith interpreted those events…. The Scriptures reflect this dynamic of the “story of God woven into the life of the community of faith through the centuries.

In this way the Scriptures, the Bible, becomes relational. Relational in the way in which it was initially received. Relational in the way it is interpreted and applied within faith communities.

The three other essays are also excellent. Of note is Dwight Swanson’s The Authority of the Bible. Swanson packs so much into his short essay that I would have to quote the whole thing, so I’ll just say that it is well worth the read.

Section III, The Christian Life in Relational Perspective, has seven essays in living out the Christian life relationally, the way it is intended.

In Prayer and our Relationship with God Libby Tedder tells us, “Prayer is to relational theology as communication is to relationship. You cannot have one without the other.”  She acknowledges that for some the idea of prayer brings up feelings of guilt, we know we are supposed to pray, but aren’t clear on how, so we neglect it.

Relational theology affirms that prayer affects us. But there is a sense in which it also affects God.

God affected by our prayers. Let that dwell a moment. God affected by our prayers.

Prayer literally changes the world. The way we pray relate to Godin prayer changes the way we live and move and have our being. By transforming us, prayer transforms the way God is present to the world by opening up new ways for love to abound…. Praying is the waking up to the presence of God.

Tedder goes on to talk about different ways to pray, some components of prayer.

Prayer can engage all the senses. Prayer can be turning to the inner world of reflections and the outer wolrd electric with clues that God is on the move.

Prayer is relational, it is interaction with God.

There is one more section, Ethics and Justice in Relational Perspective which I will get in another post very soon.

Again the book is Relational Theology: A Contemporary Introduction,  (2012), Eds. Brint Montgomery, Thomas Jay Oord, and Karen Winslow, Point Loma Press, San Diego. It is available from Amazon in both paperback and Kindle editions.


Your Brain Fries on Biblical Inerrancy


Biblical inerrancy assumes God dictated the Bible exactly in the same way that God dictated the Qur’an. But the very name Israel suggests that this isn’t so.

Faith Communities, Revelation, & Interpretations

I attend two different communities. My home church is in a mainline, big tent denomination whose roots are more via media than classical Protestant, although I believe that we are considered such. The other community I attend is conservative fundamentalist Protestant. I attend here as part of my job working in recovery and ex-offender re-entry. Theologically the two communities are on different planets. Maybe this goes without saying, but theologically I am more at home in my home church/denomination than in the other community.

I used to have a great deal of trouble with the teaching at the fundamentalist church. I am not a dispensationalist or a Calvinist or Reformed. I cannot read the Bible literally (I don’t think anyone can or does.) I cannot affirm the Chicago Statements on Biblical Inerrancy. I think that science can and does inform us as to the mechanisms God used in creating. I agree with them that God IS Creator. I am gay affirming, they would teach that homosexual behavior is a mortal sin.  They see God’s love as subordinate to His Sovereignty. They affirm the omni statements literally, God knows all including the future in all its detail, that He is everywhere at all times, that there is nothing God cannot do. I’m sorry but I cannot affirm these statements. I do not believe that the future is fixed, it doesn’t really exist so it is unknowable in its details, even to God. I do not believe that God is capable of acting in ways contrary to His nature, which is Love.

Now as much as I might disagree with some of the teachings within this community I admire the heart and praxis. From the pastor, who has one of the best hearts I’ve witnessed in a Christian throughout all of congregants I have met there is a true love of humanity. This love leads them into great action. They feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and as far as possible they house the homeless. The rehab program I work for is a ministry of this church, so that takes care of comforting those in prison. They visit those in the hospitals. This love is for the community at large, not just those within this flock. This congregation is being the hands and feet of Jesus in the world. While they are not and never will gay affirming, neither would they condemn or reject those of the LGBT community, although the teachings might have them feeling condemned and rejected. When it comes to one-on-one personal interaction the love would be felt. I feel it and for those of you who have read my post Lenses will recognize that I am not easy to love, accept in a community.

As I said I used to have trouble with some of the teachings in this community, but no more. You see I have long held that inspiration is God revealing Godself within communities of faith. These communities then struggle with how best to communicate that revelation for itself, their posterity, and for other communities of faith. I think that this fits with what I know of the early rabbinic tradition and with the name of the first real faith community, Israel (struggle with God). I used to think of this solely for the communities out of which come the texts compiled into the Bible. But, I have been led to start broadening that, to really embrace the Big Tent ideal of my denomination. I have come to see through this little fundamentalist congregation’s loving heart and action that maybe just maybe God isn’t through revealing Godself to and within faith communities. This community professes the essentials of the Christian faith. They may add to these minimal essentials as stated in the early ecumenical creeds, but they affirm the creeds. So, I have come to see that expanding the essentials  is right for this community, even if it isn’t for me. My understanding of the early rabbinic tradition seems to say that it was okay for different rabbis and different communities to have different interpretations. I think that I am becoming increasingly sympathetic to this idea. We are all different, our communities are different maybe our interpretations, so long as they are firmly grounded in orthodoxy, orthopathy, and orthopraxis are what God wants and is within His will. After all He renamed Jacob Israel and Paul tells us that we are Israel by adoption, children of the promise. So maybe we, all of our communities are struggling with God and finding within Him what is the best interpretations for us.